|
THE TWELVE TACTS
|
The Twelve TACTs
Theses re Ancient Cultures - Tomorrow
|
|
1. NOSTRATIC HYPOTHESIS
There is a proto-Language
|
The Nostratic language hypothesis explains well the migration of peoples
and the origin of civilizations - with the Indo-European migration into the
Fertile Crescent and elsewhere having occurred from central Eurasia,
such migration having been caused by the last glacial melt and by the
drowning of the Black Sea Shelf (see Ryan & Pitman, Noah's Flood,
Simon & Schuster, 1999).
Remnant cultures of this migration
are the Sumerians, Akkadians, Kurgans, Shang, Tocharians,
Hittites, the Sanskrit speakers, the Indus Valley culture,
Minoans, the megalith cultures (e.g. Stonehenge), Mycenae, Malta,
Canary Islands, Easter Island, and the Hebrews.
Even the pyramid cultures of
Central and South America (where the Olmec hieroglyphs are very
similar to the most ancient Chinese, i.e. Shang, symbols) derive from
this expansion. In turn, the Maya astronomy and calendar derives
from these too, being very similar to Pharaonic Egyptian in both
notation and in the principle of "hieroglyph-building".
All of these scripts and languages will one day be acknowledged to have
a single common origin. Indeed, the trend toward recognition of a world
proto-language will also intensify - thus leading also to recognition of a
world proto-culture. A Nostratic connection from Latvian (Baltic) to the
language of the !Kung Bushmen in Africa will be found
(Latvian Kung = Sir, Man - root of our later term "King"), validating
Richard Leakey's hypothesis that the Bushmen's communal
cooperative semi-migrant culture led to more modern civilization.
|
2. THE SUMERIANS WERE
INDO-EUROPEANS
Fleeing the Black Sea Flood
|
The agricultural Sumerians (as the Hieroglyphic Hittites Lu(t)wians)
were Indo-Europeans, speaking an agglutinative-type of
pre-proto-Indo-European, similar to the extremely archaic Baltic
languages, especially Latvian. When this Sumerian became mixed
with the old indigenous Canaanite language of the shepherd cultures
of the Fertile Crescent, this led to the Northwest Semitic languages
(such as Akkadian) and to the later Aramaic both of which were the
lingua francae of the common people in their particular eras.
The most ancient (temple) Hebrew, however, was the language of the priests
and temple hieroglyphs - and this language was pre-proto-Indo-European
- viz. Sumerian, viz. Old Kingdom Egyptian - a language which also
became very mixed with Canaanite (Afro-Asiatic) as time progressed.
|
3. THE SUMERIANS BECAME
THE PHARAOHS
|
A small group of these Sumerians or perhaps Norse relatives,
as the shaft-tomb culture, migrated southward during a period of famine,
ultimately winding up in Egypt, building pyramids there
through technology-transfer from the Tigris & Euphrates Rivers,
going from mud-brick to stone construction and
instituting agriculture on the Nile, which ultimately made Egypt
the richest and most powerful country on earth in ancient times,
sort of an immigrant ancient United States of America, as it were.
|
4. THE SUMERIANS WERE
The HEBREWS and The PHARAOHS
|
These Sumerians were identical to the Biblical Hebrews under the
leadership of Abraham, who first colonized the Nile. His progeny,
starting with Joseph, were the initiators of pyramid-building and
pre-modern centralized government in Egypt (as is clear from the
Bible and the Nile Sehel Monument). Hence, there is a large chronological
error which exists between Biblical and Pharaonic Egyptian
chronology, as correctly alleged by Sir Isaac Newton in his Chronology
of Ancient Kingdoms more than 200 years ago.
This difference will be reconciled in coming years.
|
5. THE BIBLE
IS TRUE HISTORY
|
Hence, the Biblical accounts, events and numbers ARE for the large part
reflections of true human history. We have just interpreted the Bible
incorrectly, and new sources such as the Dead Sea Scrolls (Qumran)
will (and do) verify that this is so. The same holds true for Mishnaic texts.
The Dead Sea scrolls are "more original sources" than those once used
to "write" the Bible - sources which point even further back, to e.g.
Pharaonic Egyptian and Sumerian and Akkadian forbears - and which
show particularly the central position of astronomy in ancient religion.
|
6. ANCIENT CHRONOLOGY
MUST BE REVISED
|
The ancient chronologies are in GREAT disarray - inter alia, as bristlecone
pine analysis substantiates - due largely also to the lack of knowledge of
both ancient and modern astronomy among mainstream academics.
Examples here are the MUL.APIN series of cuneiform tablets.
The Turin Papyrus (Turin Canon) is substantially astronomical in orientation.
Indeed, the oldest Dynasties of the Bible, the oldest Sumerian Lists of Kings
and the Reigns of the Pharaohs of the Old Kingdom correspond to
astronomical calendric cycles and heavenly realms of stars, as measured by
heliacal risings and settings of stars.
The 76 kings of Abydos correspond to 4 x 19 Metonic cycles.
The 59 kings of Saqqara (Sakkara) (29+29+1)
correspond to the synodic periods of the moon.
The 12 Tribes of Israel correspond to the later 12 divisions of the Zodiac
- i.e. the tribes had heavenly comparables - as also found on the jeweled
Zodiac divisions of the Breastplate of the Hebrew High Priest - and the Old
Testament even tells us how Jacob divided these heavens among his 12 sons.
Much of this astronomy extended into mythology. Precursors of ancient
Egyptian and Sumerian Akkadian myths (e.g. Gilgamesh, Agushaya Hymn,
etc.) are found, for example, in the Latvian Dainas (Lithuanian Dainos) and
Indo-European (especially Norse) legends.
|
7. THE PYRAMIDS WERE
Temples to Astronomy, Not Tombs
|
The pyramids were not tombs, as is currently assumed (such tombs, in fact,
shaft-tombs, are at the Valley of Kings). No original mummies of pharaohs have ever been found in the pyramids - which also have not writing to the alleged deceased. Rather, the pyramids are geodetic and astronomical temples
(i.e. early churches), used for astronomical calculations,
built by the Sumerians viz. Hebrews viz. Pharaohs. Perhaps later kings used pre-existing pyramids as tombs later - but not initially.
|
8. THE COPPER SCROLL
IN ORIGINAL
and the Lost Hall of Records
IS Perhaps IN THE
CHEOPS SECRET CHAMBER
|
The decrypted original of the encrypted copy of the Copper Scroll found at
Qumran, according to the Mishnayot, maps the treasures
in the Valley of Kings and perhaps points to the Hall of Records as being
in the Great Pyramids of Giza - probably in the Secret Chamber of Sirius recently discovered there by Gantenbrink.
This appears to be so stated in the Westcar Papyrus, cf. Erman and Gardiner.
When the Hebrew Exodus took place, the priests and their families left Egypt,
taking the major documents with them - which we then
have found reproduced and copied over the centuries as the Dead Sea Scrolls,
including the Copper Scroll. These Dead Sea communities represented the last
of the progeny of the original real Old Kingdom Pharaonic priests AND pharaohs - whose families were liquidated at Masada.
|
9. OLD KINGDOM PHARAONIC
EGYPTIAN LANGUAGE IS
INDO-EUROPEAN = TEMPLE HEBREW
|
The language of the Pharaohs of the Old Kingdom was Indo-European in its
foundation, very similar to Sumerian - and very similar to modern Latvian (due
to the Latvian retention of very old Indo-European forms - it is even older than
Sanskrit in its language development). The original Indo-European of the Old
Kingdom was replaced increasingly by the Afro-Asiatic Canaanitic language of
the indigenous population of the shepherds. It was not this indigenous
population who were the early architects of either the pyramids or the Pharaonic civilization - but rather this culture was created
by the Indo-European immigrants.
|
10. NILE PYRAMID COMPLEXES
Date to 2340 BC Astronomy
|
The pyramid complexes on the Nile (including Giza) triangulate the heavens
and the Solstices and Equinoxes 2340 BC based on a calendar system originating on December 25, 3117 BC - the same date as the start of the Maya and Sanskrit calendar. The Hermetic texts long ago told us that the Egypt below was built on the model of the Egypt above. Egyptologists have erroneously presumed there were two "earthly" Egypts, i.e. upper and lower Egypt - on the Nile. No. There was only ONE Egypt on Earth - and the OTHER one was the heavens.
As found on Guanche pictographs from the Old Kingdom period, the Pharaoh
was called "Ruler, On Earth, Under Heaven" - the two Egypts. Many Egyptian
hieroglyphic names of pharaohs mean precisely the same thing.
|
11. WESTERN CULTURE
TRACES BACK TO EGYPT
|
Cultures such as those of the Lydians and Etruscans were based on the exile
or exodus of persons from Egypt - certain immigrants carrying on the priestly
tradition, so that the Roman Catholic Church, for example, can be seen as the
spiritual descendant of the first Pharaonic dynasties of priests. Indeed, all the
major modern human religions are based on the first truly organized and
astronomically based religion which we see manifested at its apex
in ancient Egypt.
|
12. JESUS WAS THE SON
OF ANTIOCHUS, THEOS
|
The transition from the Old Testament to the New Testament is interesting.
Jesus was possibly the "human" son Antiochus I of Commagene,
i.e. Antiochus I. Theos, whose son was either conceived by Elisabeth or Mary
(the nine-months as described in Luke in the Bible) and hidden among the
masses to avoid it being killed by the Romans or their executors.
Antiochus was the self-declared "King of Kings" of the royal lines of kings
of BOTH the Greeks and the Persians, tracing his motherly and fatherly lineage
to Darius the Great and Alexander the Great. Significantly and monotheistically,
Antiochus was the first king to try to unite the religions of East and West,
and this symbiosis gave rise to what we call Christianity - probably the first
true monotheistic religion (Akhenaten did not deserve this honor at all).
Christianity was then propagated further by his son Jesus (who was John the
Baptist - see Luke and Matthew in the New Testament). Judas ultimately told
the Romans who Jesus was, and this resulted in his death.
The site of Nimrud Dag (Nemrud Dag, Nimrod of the Bible) verifies this further - with Nimrod's giant mound tumulus (as large as the Great Pyramid) and its actual still-standing astronomical presentation of the star(s) of Bethlehem in an ancient stone monument. The resulting question of the "identity" of Jesus as an
actual "man" of history or as a "divine" son of God was then battled out
between the Antioch and Alexandria schools of thought about him, starting
about 200 AD. Some may rightly see Jesus as a prophet and Jesus's divinity
as a question of religion. As a matter of history, however, his existence as a
"human" is without serious doubt.
|
|
