WORLD BLOOD TYPES
A Dendrite of World Populations by Blood Groups
[Article by Andis Kaulins - using the data of Kelus and Lukaszewicz
in Hirsfeld, Probleme d. Blutgruppenforschung, Fischer Verlag]

The study of ancient mankind - YOUR history and mine, is increasingly an interdisciplinary science. The results of one branch of research must bear up to the burden of proof required by the results derived from other branches of study.

For example, whatever the results of linguistic and archaeological research may be, they will be increasingly scrutinized by other branches of science which do not deal in (what is often only) academic opinions, but in irrefutable physical facts.

One such group of facts which relates to the origins and dispersal of mankind and its languages throughout this planet - is blood data. Theories about ancient cultures and discussion about the migrations of ancient peoples will increasingly have to conform to blood data provided by the physical sciences.

We, who live in this world of DNA know that our TRUE history is etched indelibly in our genes - and in this technological age, we are increasingly in a position to read our past simply in our bodily chemistry. Or to put it in other words, we carry the answers to age-old questions about the origins of man WITHIN us. The so-called "gene pool" is reconstructable far back into the past.

Hence, we provide here a graphic which presents unavoidable FACTS. They are not the opinions of well-meaning scholars nor are they subject to challenge or change. They simply exist. Hence, theories about ancient cultures and languages which do not conform to these facts CAN NOT be true, and only those which DO conform to these facts CAN be true, although agreement does not guarantee that they ARE true.



Did you try your hand at getting the right solution? How do your numbers read from top to bottom? The odds against you getting them all right are against you - unless you are a specialist in the field of blood groups.

The correct solution, running from top to bottom in the grey box above, is:

10-1-11-3-9-6-8-2-5-4-7

There were some surprises, weren't there?

The worst scores were probably obtained by linguists and archaeologists - whose pervading theories simply DO NOT match up with the evidence of the physical sciences. The reason for this is clear. Archaeology forms its theories based on what they dig up and this is a fairly serendipity undertaking, which relies much on chance. Linguistics, up to now, is still in its baby shoes, and many of the so-called "rules" which have developed will one day be put to test in computers - using the hypotheses derived - and I for one, doubt whether many of them will work - at least not in the historical sense. New directions in e.g. Nostratic support this view.

The dendrite used here is a mathematical method of bringing ALL interrelationships on one contiguous branched line. It shows how far each group of people is from others (i.e. the length of the lines is also mathematically calculated and significant). Dotted lines mean the relationship is clear, but that the exact distance is, as yet, mathematically uncertain. Here is how the dendrite graph looks completely filled out:



The completed dendrite tells us clearly how man developed and how he scattered throughout the Earth, starting in Africa, moving northward and then branching to the East and West. Indeed this conforms with topographical data since the Alps and the mountains of Asia presented insurmountable obstacles in ancient times.

The direction of dispersal ran basically along the old Amber Trail, across the flatlands from the Black Sea to the Baltic and from thence in all directions.

This also conforms to the fact that the Baltic languages are the oldest Indo-European tongues - and, since BALT in Latvian means "white" (the old BALT inscriptions in Phoenician are transcribed as LE BA'AL'AT "the noble - white - lady"), we see here the basic line of development between the whiter-skinned paled-out races of the north and their darker-skinned sun-basked neighbors to the south (this comment is meant neutrally and NOT racially). The axis lies on the trail from Africa to the BLACK SEA and from there to the BALTIC SEA, and the color descriptions are surely ancient.

The Arabs, as shown by the blood data, must then be a mixture of whites and Africans - as perhaps recounted in the Bible - i.e. Abraham and his 2nd wife.

Oriental scholars and Egyptologists will eventually have to take these distributions of blood groups into account, especially since the blood groupings of Egyptians and Hebrews simply defy all current academic theories about the origins of the Pharaohs and the Hebrews, so also in linguistics, archaeology, religion and ethnology. Nothing could be more clear from this data, than that the Hebrews and Egyptians have a nearly common blood origin and that their geographic origin lies in the broad expanses of northern Eurasia - probably at the time of the Great Flood (see Noah's Flood by Pitman and Ryan).