Total Distribution
of Humans by Field of Fame or Eminence

All Persons (11,439 total) listed in the
Encyclopaedia Britannica, Micropaedia, 1974 edition

This is the total distribution of famous persons
as listed in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, Micropaedia.

Distribution of Famous Persons
by Month of Birth

January	February	March
April	May	June
July	August	September
October	November	December

For total distribution of all signs
see TOTAL DISTRIBUTION of Signs.

Rank of the Astrological Signs
by Field of Eminence
(e.g. Aries, 1st place, Arts)

Aries	Taurus	Gemini
Cancer	Leo	Virgo
Libra	Scorpio	Sagittarius
Capricorn	Aquarius	Pisces

For total rankings of all signs
see TOTAL RANKINGS of Signs.

Simple Data of
Total Number of Famous Persons
by Field of Eminence
as listed
in the Encyclopaedia Britannica
Micropaedia, 1974 edition.

Evaluation of the Data
by Statistical Methods
(Chi-Square, etc.)

Relation of the Data
to Annual Fluctuations
(daylight, temperature, geomagnetic activity)

Relation of the Data
to Long-Term Cycles
the Kondratieff-Saros Cycle

Some outside research
by Kop and Heuts
on Marriage Partners
and Month of Birth

Humans have always tried to reach for the stars and to bring them down
to an understandable human level. Astrology makes the stars "relevant”.

The general conception of scientists that all of astrology is bunk, has not been empirically proven, one way or the other. The geneticists and physicists tell us we are all formed of sub-atomic particles so small that we can not see them.

If the Moon is powerful enough to influence water on Planet Earth and to create ocean tides, then why not us? Are our fluids immune? We consist of 90% water.

Yet, a number of years ago, a number of Nobel Prize Winners signed a document in the Humanist, stating that Astrology had no foundation in fact, EVEN THOUGH THESE SCIENTISTS HAD DONE NO RESEARCH ON THE SUBJECT. A poor showing by the Nobel Laureates. VERY UNSCIENTIFIC. What was THEIR empirical evidence?

Upon hearing this, I bet a colleague (an astrology opponent) a bottle of champagne that an empirical study of the birthdates of famous persons would show statistically significant “seasonal” deviations, quite apart from the alleged cause. That is how this work on astrology on my part came to be. Not only did I win the wager, but I read much of the Encyclopaedia Britannica (30 volumes) in the process, noting my information on 3x5 cards as I went along.

Much of my fairly broad exposure to all subjects derives from this period.
I became versed in virtually every field of human knowledge. From astrology to astronomy.

L
E
X
I
L
I
N
E

Languages

Ancient
Near East

Origins of
Astronomy

Learning

Prehistoric Art

Click here to sign up for the LexiLine List on the History of Civilization

Popular Sites
Internet Law Web
World Megaliths

Popular Sites
Dyslexia Learning
Andis Kaulins

Total Distribution of Humans by Field of Fame or Eminence

Total Distribution
of Humans by Field of Fame or Eminence